Additive Manufacturing Requires Additive Design Techniques


Reading time ( words)

Although I am not a designer by trade, I want to share my thoughts on what additive manufacturing means for designers, especially how it relates to solder mask. I feel the following topics are the most important to address.

1. Definition of Solder Mask
By its nature, the definition provided by any EDA tool is a negative one; the CAM vector files specify what goes away from an assumed continuous surface. Until now, solder mask has always presented itself as subtractive. SUSS MicroTec developed a front end, JETxSMFE, that can operate at the CAM station to smooth out manufacturing. The software understands all of this, managing the details correctly on the incoming files.

luca_fig1_0422.jpg2. The Advantage of Inkjet Solder Mask
One advantage of inkjet solder mask is to avoid any filling of holes or vias. Another way, maybe an annoyance to some, is to say that “tenting” is not possible. Still, the consensus is that solder mask-free vias improve a board’s reliability (Figure 1). The JETxSMFE removes solder mask at declared holes. Undeclared drills, which might still exist depending on the manufacturing convention on the production floor, will result in ink on the print table. This is not a big issue as a scraper easily removes excess solder mask, and alternatively, replacing the table or its liner (if present) gets the job done. However, both solutions lead to a small downtime. Long story short, if you want friends on the shop floor, be sure to have all the drills in your design.

3. The Dam Dogma
These small solder mask traces on laminate are supposed to separate two nearby copper pads. Such a pattern indicates the non-solder mask defined (NSMD) pad design choice. However, this choice involves several constraints, and these create an artificial need for narrow dams. From my earlier example, this time with numbers: Imagine two pads, 200 µm apart, nothing extreme. What is the maximum size of a dam between these two? Assuming that LDI technology is used, the dam size results from applying the state-of-the-art constraint of the technology. This 200 µm pitch decreases by the laser beam width plus the registration accuracy twice—one for each pad. Therefore, it quickly comes down to 100 µm. Any more challenging a pad distance will also make it harder to define a dam.

From this reasoning, the many requests to create 50 µm dams or less with traditional technology seem legitimate. So, what do we do with inkjet printing? Does it join the race to the last micrometer?

To find out the answers, continue reading this article in the April 2022 issue of Design007 Magazine.

Share




Suggested Items

Advanced Packaging Means Advanced Routing Issues

01/26/2023 | Kris Moyer, IPC
In today’s ever-shrinking world of electronics designs, the use of BGA parts with very fine pitch features is becoming more prevalent. As these fine-pitch BGAs continue to increase in complexity and user I/O (number of balls), the difficulty of finding escape routes and fan-out patterns increases. Additionally, with the shrinking of silicon geometry leading to both smaller channel length and increased signal integrity issues, some of the traditional BGA escape routing techniques will require a revisit and/or adjustment to allow for not only successful fan-out, but also successful functioning of the circuitry of the BGA design.

Everyone Wants Change: Who Wants to Lead the Way?

01/25/2023 | Nolan Johnson, I-Connect007
Nolan Johnson recently met with Alun Morgan, technology ambassador at Ventec, and Ventec COO Mark Goodwin to discusses the industry’s determination to cling to outdated processes and standards, and some potential consequences. To maintain efficiency and keep pace with the market’s newest entries in Asia, Alun and Mark believe that legacy companies in the West must be open to challenging conversations that will require questioning old practices and revising those practices toward sustainability.

The Battle of the Boards

01/12/2023 | Patrick Crawford, IPC
Last year, IPC held its first-ever design competition at IPC APEX EXPO in San Diego. PCB designers from around the world competed in a series of heats during the months before the show, culminating in a showdown on the show floor between the top three finalists. Rafal Przeslawski, now with AMD, took home the top prize last year. This year, the competition is back for its sophomore year. I asked Patrick Crawford, manager of design standards and related programs for IPC, to “layout” the details on the design contest, including lessons learned in 2022 and what’s new for the 2023 competition.



Copyright © 2023 I-Connect007 | IPC Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.