The Big Picture: Globalization—Imagine a United States That Isn't United

Think about how the U.S. economy would look if it were fragmented with 50 state fiefdoms, each with their own rules and barriers blocking the free flow of goods and services across state lines. What if Amazon couldn’t open a distribution warehouse in Illinois without onerous tariffs? Imagine California farmers paying tariffs to export avocadoes to Michigan or border patrol and customs agents searching cars going from the republic of Arizona into the sovereign state of New Mexico.

If this were to happen, people would experience reduced standards of living and rampant unemployment almost overnight. Without fluid markets and lack of investment across state lines, the U.S. would collapse immediately into global economic mediocrity. We cannot even imagine such a scenario, yet that is exactly what’s happening—fortunately not across state lines, but across global borders.

The idea of globalization was to raise the world’s standard of living. How else would people in India and China start to afford iPhone and other goods and services we so desperately want to export to keep our economic engine running? We need more globalization, not less, to raise the world’s standard of living.

I’m writing this about a month before the U.S. election. The aftermath of COVID-19 has created an even larger gap between the “haves” versus the “have nots.” Unlike what some claim, this is clearly turning into a K-shaped recovery where a certain portion of the population is thriving even more than before COVID-19, and the rest of the population is jobless. If you’re one of them, it can feel difficult having to depend on government subsidies to maintain a roof over your head and feed your family.

I see this in our own business. We’ve had record revenues since COVID-19 started, whereas many friends are struggling to stay busy. What’s happening in the U.S. is a microcosm of why the result of globalization is critical. The lower and middle class are seeing an almost-overnight decline in their standard of living. The result? There are fewer consumers, even in the U.S., that will be able to afford iPhones.

We have to start the hard work to get globalization back on track. Globalization can be a highly disruptive force. The world saw its first great era of globalization from 1870 to 1914. During this time, there was a mass migration from Europe to the New World. GDP grew anywhere from 50–70% between Europe and “the New World,” including South America, the U.S., and Canada. Migration rates were unprecedented—up to 11% of various Europeans migrated. That globalization brought great prosperity.

As Milton Keynes famously said in 1914, “The inhabitant of London could order by telephone, sipping his morning tea in bed, the various products of the whole earth, in such quantity as he might see fit, and reasonably expect their early delivery upon his doorstep; he could, at the same moment and by the same means, adventure his wealth in the natural resources and new enterprises of any quarter of the world, and share, without exertion or even trouble, in their prospective fruits and advantages.”

Yet, in spite of this, globalization was one of the forces that led to World War I because it has significant destabilizing effects. When one starts to allocate resources more efficiently—labor and capital, and even land—that creates losers. And people don’t like to be losers; it’s the ultimate seed for going to war.

Globalization disrupted both international power structures and domestic ones. It wasn’t until the 1960s and 1970s that trade recaptured its share of global GDP, and countries like the U.S. started to re-open borders to immigrants in a substantial way. Capital flows started more so in the 1980s. The intervening period between the 1910s and the 1960s saw two world wars and a great depression.

Since the 1960s, the export share of global GDP has more than doubled. New economic powers emerged to challenge American dominance—first Japan, now China, and potentially India. Two big changes have occurred: manufacturing capacity has moved from the developed world to Asia, and technology has rewarded skilled workers and widened pay gaps. Voters rebelled by turning to parties that reject globalization.

Just as in the first era, globalization has disrupted international and domestic power structures. I don’t believe this will lead to another world war as it did in 1914. The real danger is a zero-sum game. Governments will attempt to and appear to grab a larger share of the global trade for their own countries, and this will eventually cause trade to shrink. Much as an un-United States would cripple our own economy, the forces against globalization are on a path to cripple the global economy.

Mehul J. Davé is CEO and chairman of Entelechy Global Inc. and chairman of Linkage Technologies Inc.



The Big Picture: Globalization—Imagine a United States That Isn't United


What if the U.S. was fragmented with 50 state fiefdoms, each with their own rules and barriers blocking the free flow of goods and services across state lines? We cannot even imagine such a scenario, yet that is exactly what’s happening—fortunately not across state lines, but across global borders. Mehul Davé advocates for starting the hard work to get globalization back on track.

View Story

The Big Picture: COVID-19 Helps Kill Globalization


Globalization was in trouble even before the pandemic. The decades-long open system of trade that dominated the world economy has been damaged by the financial crisis and—more recently—the Sino-American trade war. Mehul Davé explains how COVID-19 has added a third-body blow to globalization.

View Story

The Big Picture: Globalization—The Onset of COVID-19


In Mehul Davé's last column, he spoke to the challenges of tariffs and alternate sources for PCBs and the larger divide between the U.S. and China, potentially leading to far broader implications for U.S.-led vs. China-led technologies. The world has changed dramatically since then. Mehul explores how the COVID-19 outbreak has impacted the rollout of 5G and relations between the U.S. and China.

View Story

The Big Picture: Globalization—Tariffs and Alternate Sources


The new year is upon us, so Mehul Davé started thinking about the main challenges his company and customers are facing as we enter 2020: tariffs and finding alternate sources for PCBs. Mehul shares his thoughts.

View Story


The Big Picture: Globalization—What Happened?


Cheap products and services from places like China and India are good, but giving up the position of being the top dog doesn't sit well with most people—especially when you have leaders around the world reminiscing about the past and wanting to make XYZ great again or something similar.

View Story

Can Do in CAM Outsourcing: CAM Engineering— Building Redundancy in Critical Areas


Many believe that outsourcing is wrong because it takes away from local jobs. That may be the case if this industry can find the talent level at a cost that they can afford, but this is not the case in North America or Europe.

View Story


‘Can Do’ in CAM Outsourcing: Improving Quality in CAM Engineering


In this series, Mehul J. Davé, CEO of Entelechy Global Inc., will address six ways in which a company can significantly benefit from outsourcing their front-end CAM work.

View Story

CAM Engineering—Reducing Costs


While having on-demand capacity, improved automation, and fast turn-around are critical to any front-end engineering operation, achieving those goals with a cost-effective solution is imperative. Electronics are constantly under cost-reduction pressures. Functionality, capability, and complexity increase while costs decrease.

View Story


CAM Engineering—Fast Turn-Around


Time-to-market has been the mantra for every successful technology company. The best among them have strong and integrated supply chains that march to the drum of the OEMs and EMS providers that bring that technology to market. A big part of that success, especially in North America and Europe, is the ability for PCB manufacturers to turn around complex PCBs very quickly. The hallmark of PCB production in these higher-tech, higher-cost regions is flexibility and responsiveness.

View Story


CAM Engineering – Automation


As volume production in PCB has shifted significantly to Asia, manufacturers in Europe and North America have been focusing on high technology, quick-turn, prototype, and lower-volume production.

View Story

A Case for Outsourcing CAM Engineering


In the West, outsourcing is sometimes considered taboo and many believe it is one of the causes for shifting our manufacturing base to the East—specifically China and other lower cost Asian countries. In this series of columns, I will make a case in support of CAM outsourcing—especially for North American and Western European printed circuit board manufacturers.

View Story
Copyright © 2021 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.